A Comparative Study of Seismic Behaviour of G+10 Storey Building with RCC and Composite Columns for Different Configurations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijce/2022/v5i2/172606Keywords:
Base Shear
, Equivalent Static Method, Response Spectrum Method, Storey Drift, Storey Displacement, Storey Stiffness.Publishing Chronology
, Manuscript Received, August 24, 2022, Revised, September 14, Accepted, September 23, 2022. Date of Publication, December 5, 2022.Abstract
In India, RCC structures are most commonly used as these are very much convenient for multistorey buildings. Steel concrete composite construction is not preferred because of its complexity in its analysis and design. It has unique characteristics of both the materials which results in greater economy and safety. In the present investigation, ETABS 2018 software is used for the analysis of a G+10 multistorey building of three different geometrical shapes of same plan area of 225m2. Comparison of seismic behaviour is done for all the three different plan areas consisting of RCC columns and composite columns. The various parameters considered in the study are storey displacement, storey drift, storey stiffness, and base shear. Comparison is done for four parameters for different cases and the best of the configuration is found out. Study of the above parameters is done by adopting response spectrum method for Zone III and Zone V.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
S. Muffassir and L. G. Kalurkar, "Study of wind analysis of multi-storey composite structure for plan irregularity," Int. J. Advanced Tech. Eng. Sci., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 37–40, 2016.
Design of composite steel and concrete structures, EN 1994-1-1, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1994.1.1.2004.pdf
Vijay Kumar and Dinesh Sen, "Seismic analysis of high rise building (G+10) using Etabs," Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3337–3344, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V7/i9/IRJET-V7I9592.pdf
Anargha, B. S. and Mithulraj, M., "Comparative study on behaviour of R.C.C and composite multistoreyed building using ETABS," Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 167–170, 2019. [Online] Available: https://www.ripublication.com/ijaerspl2019/ijaerv14n12spl_30.pdf
Vedha, M. and U. F. Pash, "Study of seismic and wind effects on multistorey R.C.C, steel and composite materials buildings using ETABS," Int. J. Eng. Res. Tech., Special Issue, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.17577/IJERTCONV7IS09019.
Dheekshith K. and N. Kumar M., "Comparative study on seismic analysis of two RC buildings with irregularities under varying seismic zones," Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 81–87, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V5/i7/IRJET-V5I716.pdf
A. Alwani, "Seismic & wind analysis and design of high rise building in different seismic zones," Int. J. Scientific Res. Develop., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 78–82, 2016. [Online].Available: https://www.ijsrd.com/articles/IJSRDV4I70112.pdf
Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures, IS 1893 (Part 1), 2016.
S. M. Dhapa, N. S. Mehta, A. M. Butala, and A. Bhuva, "Comparison of behavior of multi-storey building with RCC column and composite column," Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 81–86, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.irjet.net/archives/V8/i7/IRJET-V8I714.pdf
Dimensions for hot rolled steel beam, column, channel and angle sections, IS 808, 1989, (Reaffirmed 2004), p. SECTION 3 Column/Heavy Weight Beam Sections.
