Man-Made Disaster : Lessons Learnt from Recent February 6, 2023 Turkey Earthquake of Magnitude M<sub>w</sub> 7.8

Authors

  •   Amit Srivastava Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Graphic Era (Deemed to be) University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijce/2024/v7i1/174037

Keywords:

Civil engineering

, construction, earthquake, infrastructure, man-made disaster.

Paper Submission Date

, March 1, 2024, Paper sent back for Revision, March 12, Paper Acceptance Date, March 20, Paper Published Online, June 5, 2024.

Abstract

"The Best Creator on the Earth after God is Civil Engineer" (quoted by unknown) as they work exuberantly for the built environment and create a livable world for us. This requires extreme engineering from planning, analysis, design, construction, and maintenance to demolition. If anything goes wrong at any stage, it can prove to be a disaster and because there is no retake in the profession, it may lead to huge economic loss to the society or nation including loss to thousands of lives. Such disasters are sometimes so huge that it can be categorized as man-made disaster and the world has witnessed the same in the recent Turkey earthquake of magnitude Mw = 7.8 in which total damage is estimated to be US $118.8 billion, leading to total casualties 59,259 deaths, 1,21,704 injured, and 297 missing. Major casualties were due to widespread damage or collapse of buildings and infrastructure that were expected to protect the people but they actually proved devil for them. Forensic investigation revealed some shocking evidence of poor design and construction practices that prevailed. For example, slab directly resting on columns, thick slab on thin columns, insufficient longitudinal bars or stirrups etc. The manuscript presents the outcome of some of those studies that will help future engineers who wish to venture in the Civil Engineering profession and willing to learn from failure of case studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Srivastava, A. (2024). Man-Made Disaster : Lessons Learnt from Recent February 6, 2023 Turkey Earthquake of Magnitude M<sub>w</sub> 7.8. AMC Indian Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijce/2024/v7i1/174037

References

National Earthquake Information Center, “M 7.8 - Pazarcik earthquake, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence,†USGS. [Online]. Available:https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jllz/executive

B. Aktug, H. Ozener, A. Dogru, A. Sabuncu, B. Turgut, K. Halicioglu, O. Yilmaz, and E. Havazli, “Slip rates and seismic potential on the East Anatolian Fault System using an improved GPS velocity field,†J. Geodynamics, vol. 94–95, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2016.01.001.

W. Chen, G. Rao, D. Kang, Z. Wan, and D. Wang, “Early report of the source characteristics, ground motions, and casualty estimates of the 2023 M w 7.8 and 7.5 Turkey earthquakes,†J. Earth Sci., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 297–303, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12583-023-1316-6.

A. Portillo and L. Moya, “Seismic risk regularization for urban changes due to earthquakes: A case of study of the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence,†Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 11, id 2754, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15112754.

E. Hussain, S. Kalaycıoğlu, C.W. D. Milliner, and Z. Z. Çakir, “Preconditioning the 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquake disaster,†Nature Reviews Earth Environment, vol. 4, pp. 287–289, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s43017-023-00411-2.

Z. Qu, F. Wang, X. Chen, X. Wang, and Z. Zhou, “Rapid report of seismic damage to hospitals in the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequences,†Earthquake Res. Advances, vol. 3, no. 4, May 2023, Art. no. 100234, doi: 10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100234.

M. Mavrouli, S. Mavroulis, E. Lekkas, and A. Tsakris, “An emerging health crisis in Turkey and Syria after the earthquake disaster on 6 February 2023: Risk factors, prevention and management of infectious diseases,†Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 7, 2023, Art. no. 1022, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11071022.

E. Garini and G. Gazetas, “The 2 earthquakes of February 6th 2023 in Turkey,†NTUA, Greece, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.issmge.org/filemanager/article/1195/Gazetas-M7.8-Turkey.pdf

Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1: General provisions and buildings, [CED 39: Earthquake Engineering], IS 1893-1, New Delhi, 2002 (Reaffirmed 2022).

P. Rautela, G. C. Joshi, and B. Bhaisora, “Seismic vulnerability and risk in the Himalayan township of Mussoorie, Uttarakhand, India,†Current Sci., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 521–526, 2010. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24109577.

T. Y. Duman and Ö. Emre, “The East Anatolian fault: Geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics,†Geological Society, London, vol. 372, pp. 495–529, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1144/sp372.14.

“Learning from the earthquake in Turkey,†CUNDALL. [Online]. Available: https://www.cundall.com/ideas/blog/learning-from-the-earthquake-in-t%C3%BCrkiye